top of page
Stanley C. Sandstrom
Representative Trial Experience
From Fortune 500 companies, to companies building their fortune, SCS is trusted to support amazing clients such as AT&T, Pfizer, CISCO, BAYER, P&G, Johnson & Johnson, and many more.
Since 1995 and more than 95.5 billion dollars in jury awards and business marketing campaigns, SCS has been proven “in the courts” as being dependable, innovative, and committed to connecting your message to your audience.
Photo: Los Angeles County, Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse, Long Beach
REPRESENTATIVE CASES
Demonstrative Illustration
Schweitzer-Mauduit
Consider the Evidence
Brennan v. MiraMontes Timeline
ExxonMobil Mock Demonstrative Illustration
6
74
13
37
5
43
ExxonMobil v. Southern California Edison -
Alleged Multi-million dollar breach of contract and damage claims
MANATT, LA, et al.
Production; Technology Consulting; Presentation Systems; Graphics; On-Site Hot-Seat Support.
MGM v. Perini: Las Vegas – City Center Construction Defect Litigation
The case involved more than $400 million in damage claims.
Greenberg Traurig, Las Vegas, et al.
Under the direction of Gary Puls, LegalEdge Trial Technology Consulting, SCS provided Production; Technology Consulting; Display Systems; and On-Site Support.
This case involved 3 million digitally stored pieces of evidence and 100’s of hours of deposition video.
CSIRO v. Cisco
Patent Infringement Case: Involving the “significant role” of 802.11 WiFi chips.
Duane Morris – Norwood Jameson
Mock Trial Support; Production Service; Technology Consulting; Display Systems; Support
Keahole Point Fish, LLC v. Skretting Canada, Inc.
K&L GATES & Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel
Jeffrey Johnson, Partner (K&L GATES) & Thomas Benedict, Partner (Goodsill)
Mock Trial Support, Graphics; Limited Video Production Services
International Paint Litigation―Miami
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, llp
Lindsey Blenkhorn
Production Services; Graphics; Trial Technology Consulting; Display Systems
Delacruz v. CytoSport
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, llp
Lindsey Blenkhorn
Production; Graphics, Photography; Trial Technology Consulting
ITC Hearing: Schweitzer-Mauduit v. Glatz | Liptec | Delforth Group
Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz
Rudy Hutz, Partner, Jeffrey L. Eichen, Partner, et al.
Production; Graphics; Technology Consulting; Display Systems ; War Room systems designs, support, & integration
AT&T – Universal Service Fee (USF)
Class-Action: AT&T did not conspire with Sprint or MCI Worldcom Network Services Inc.
Sidley Austin | Bryan Cave
Charles W. Douglas, John W. Treece, and David Giardina, et al.
Production; Technology Consulting; Display Systems; Support
VAN DEVENTER v. Credit Suisse – First Boston, CS SCF MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County.
Weil Gotshal & Manges
Jay Fastow, John Mastando, et al.
Production; Technology Consulting; Display Systems; Support
Bayer – Talecris v. Baxter
Intellectual Property Case: Summary judgment in favor of Talecris.
Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz | Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice
Jeff Bove, Mary Bourke, Chris Jeffers, Mark Freeman, Mary Bourke, et al. Technology Consulting, Graphics, and Display Systems
Inline v. AOL | Earthlink
Multi-party Intellectual Property jury trial involving ADSL technology
Duane Morris – Norwood Jameson, Matthew Gaudet, et al.
Latham & Watkins – Robert Gunther, Kurt Rogers, et al.
Production; Technology Consulting; Display Systems; Support
Schick v. Gillette – Arbitration
Intellectual Property: Comfort & shave quality of Gillette’s 5 blade razor.
Weil Gotshal & Manges
James Quinn, Bruce Mayer, et al.
Production; Technology Consulting; Display Systems; Support
Martek Biosciences Corp. v Lonza
Intellectual Property case involving omega-3 fatty acids from algae.
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice
George Pazuniak, Mary Bourke, et al.
Production; Technology Consulting; Display Systems
Applied Medical Systems v. Johnson & Johnson - Ethicon et al. Weil Gotshal & Manges | Sidley Austin
James Quinn, Scott Martin, et al., John Treece, David Giardina, et al.
Production; Technology Consulting; Display Systems; Mock Jury Support
War Room Facilities Management; Data/Communications; Office Furnishings & Equipment
Monsanto v. Bayer Crop Science
Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz | Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice George Pazuniak, Mary Bourke, et al. Timothy Barber, et al.
Production, Technology Consulting, Graphics, and Display Systems
Managed Health Care –
United Health Care; PacificCare & Coventry Health Care
Weil Gotshal & Manges | Cooley Godward | Powell Goldstein
James Quinn, William Grauer, Guillermo Cabrera, Robert Denham, et al.
Production; Technology Consulting; Display Systems; Mock Jury Support
Einstein v. Gateway Computers – Complex Commercial Litigation
Cooley Godward
William Grauer, Guillermo Cabrera, et al.
Production, Technology Consulting, Graphics, and Display Systems
Yamanuha v. Takahashi (Real Estate Investment Contract) – Real Estate
Snell & Wilmer
William O’Hare, Deborah Mellgrave et al.
Technology Consulting, Graphic Services and Display Systems
Ranbaxy v. Pfizer (Lipitor)
Intellectual Property Case: Pfizer’s ‘893 and ‘995 patents relate to atorvastatin calcium (Lipitor®), the world’s best-selling drug
Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz
Rudy Hutz, Jeff Bove, Mary Bourke, et al.
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
Hagen v. Fox Nutrition – Personal Injury, Product Liability
Moore, Winter, Skebba & McLennan
Sean E. Tiedt, Barbara J. Micha., et al.
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
B. Anderson v. Plaster Development Co. – Construction Defect
Lorber, Greenfield, Polito & Pengilly
James W. Pengilly, et al.
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
Colgate v. Procter & Gamble
Weil, Gotshal & Manges
Jim Quinn, Randi Singer, et al.
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
Modi (India) v. ESPN
Weil, Gotshal & Manges
Jim Quinn, David Lender, Salvatore A. Romanello, et al
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
R4 Holdings v. General Atlantic Partners (TICKETS.COM)
Snell & Wilmer | Paul, Weiss
William O’Hare, Steven Rosenfeld, et al.
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
ExxonMobil v. SABIC
Weil, Gotshal & Manges
Jim Quinn, David Lender, Salvatore A. Romanello, et al.
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
USA v. Koch Inc.
Crowe & Dunlevy
Harvey D Ellis, Jr, Clyde A Muchmore, Timila S Rother, Mark S Grossman, Wesley C Fredenburg
Production, Technology Consulting, Display and Computer Systems Design and Installation, War Room systems design, Build & integration
Syntron v. Genix
Baker & McKenzie
Craig Celnicker, Steve Comer, George Yu
Limited Production, Technology Consulting, Graphics
Foodmaker v. Vons
Thorsnes, Bartolotta & McGurie
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
Full in-House Production Systems, installation, Training, and Support
RPA v. DeKalb & Monsanto
Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz
Technology Consulting, Display Systems, and War Room Systems
Aventis v. DeKalb
Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz
Technology Consulting, Display and War Room Display Systems
War Room systems designs, support, & integration
EIE Guam v. Long Term Credit Bank, Japan (Shinsei Bank)
Calvo and Clark, Guam
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
War Room systems designs, support, & integration
Zeneca v. RPA
Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz
Technology Consulting, and Display and War Room Systems
War Room systems designs, support, & integration
Roustaei v. ScanQuest & Symbol
Baker & McKenzie
Production, Technology Consulting, Display Systems &
Graphics Design
Integra v. Merck KgaA
Campbell &Flores
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
War Room systems designs, support, & integration
United States v. Hercules
Thorsnes, Bartolotta & McGurie
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
Full in-House Production Systems, Build, installation, Training, and Maintenance
Sigma-Tau v. Lonza
Oblon Spivak
Production, Technology Consulting, and Display Systems
War Room systems designs, support, & integration
Other Notable Litigations Supported by SCS:
The Regents of the University of California v. David Kohne, et.al.
Jerome R. Singer v. The Regents of the University of California
Electronic Tire Technology v. Goodyear Tire Corporation
Honeywell v. American Flywheel Systems
Anjinomoto v. Archer Daniels Midland
Corning v. SOLiD
Simcoe v. Bond Distributing
Brennan v. MiraMontes Properties
CAG v. Gulf Pacific Rice
Cortes v. County of Santa Clara
Anchor-EIE Guam
Consistent delivery of premium and timely visual communications & technology support services.
Relentless attention to detail and craft to produce compelling visual communication graphics and presentations.
We equip our clients with the best fit in technologies and comprehensive support and provisioning services.
From the boardroom to the living room, we produce innovative, visual-messaging for tailored visual impact.
bottom of page